|
The Mars-List Discussion on Creationism
Table Of Contents
(all posts, Parts 1-15)
|
|
-» -» -» UNDER CONSTRUCTION «- «- «-
|
|
- Another Take On It (10/23/00 12:47 PM, Part 1)
An online acquaintance of mine, Robert Baty, had been discussing legends about the reknowned oceanographer Matthew Maury, and how young earth creationists (YECs) promotion of such legendary, but false, material was indicative of an overall problem about the attitude of YECs in general with regard to being responsible about not promoting error and about correcting their own mistakes. As many YECs do, Terence Sheridan misconstrues the whole discussion, and tries to make the issue into a matter of personalities and politics rather than being an empirical matter about reality itself. Robert cc'd a couple of Terence's posts to me — and my mars-list discussion begins.
- Re: Another Take On It (10/25/00 9:32 AM, Part 1)
I continue to point out to Terence the implicit ad hominem nature of his remarks, and the fact that they are irrelevant (not to mention wrong, by and large).
- Re: A YEC's Misrepresentations (10/26/00 4:56 AM, Part 1)
Just clearing up some more misrepresentations by Terence. Plus a few online links regarding the YEC moon dust claims, about which a discussion was just winding down in mars-list.
- SN1987A (10/27/00 3:53 PM, Part 1)
I begin my discussion of the example SN1987A in particular. Note that Jack Wirtz (who prompted my post here) is a modern day geocentrist. Yes, in the flesh!
- Re: Jack's View of Relativity - Another Rabbit? (10/27/00 4:25 PM, Part 1)
I'm always amazed at how blatantly YECs take things out of context, or how they run on with grandiose anti-scientific rhetoric based on their own misunderstandings of science. Of course, this particular YEC not only thinks the universe did not exist prior to about 6,000 years ago (in the face of direct observation to the contrary) but still thinks geocentrism has some credence, so what more can we expect?
- Re: SN1987A (10/28/00 10:45 AM, Part 1)
As usual, in a discussion forum like this, any criticism whatsoever of YEC must be met by a full YEC volley. Instead of responding to the flurry of posts separately, I put it all together in one post. This one features such treats as the notorious Steve Rudd, a YEC who demonstrates little understanding of the positions of other YECs whose positions are different from his (either that, or he really did know better, in which case his comments were purposely false for the sole intention of trying to make it look like I was the one who was misrepresenting young earth creationism; you be the judge). Steve failed to understand that SN1987A's distance is measured by trigonometry. Of course, he also thought that matter couldn't travel much faster than 5 miles per second (you know, the speed of the space shuttle in orbit!!!). And Steve considers himself to be one of the "movers and shakers" of the YEC movement in the Church of Christ! Is it any wonder we find so many people being led astray about the truth, with discredited YEC propaganda like this that never dies due to being continuously recirculated in YEC circles by people who thrive on "obstinacy-in-error"?
- Re: SN1987A (10/29/00 5:37 PM, Part 2)
Another multiple-response post. Steve Rudd refuses to admit that he was wrong to characterize my representation of various YEC positions as "wild statements", and tries to further defend his false characterization. I refuse to let him get away with it. Steve pretends that he presented some kind of "formula" which showed that SN1987A was only 2 light-years from the earth. I refuse to let him get away with his pretension. Steve begins discussing the common YEC pretension about lightspeed decay being "one of the hottest topics debated in the scientific journals" in support of his contention that the SN1987A explosion reached the earth in less than 168,000 years. I begin discussing some of the YEC fallacies on this particular item.
- Re: SN1987A (10/30/00 11:13 AM, Part 2)
Contrary to Steve Rudd's "scientific" creationist approach, Terence Sheridan's approach is that of advocating the "apparent age" concept (which acknowledges that the scientific evidence really does indicate antiquity — just as I've been saying all along). Unfortunately, in not wishing to accept the foundational philosophical subjectivism that the apparent age concept really represents, Terence has surrounded his acceptance of this concept with logically incoherent rhetoric. While I continue to hash out details regarding SN1987A and other related empirical matters, I begin to comment on the apparent age concept and its advocacy by many YECs.
- Re: SN1987A (10/30/00 11:40 PM, Part 2)
Another multiple-response post. You know, for being "one of the hottest topics debated in the scientific journals" (as claimed by Steve Rudd), it's rather interesting that he can't produce the requested citations to back up his claim. Of course, in typical YEC fashion, Steve demonstrates absolutely no embarrassment over his bluster. Why should he? Steve exemplifies the typical YEC attitude regarding being obstinate-in-promoting-error. I discuss some ways by which the uniformity of lightspeed over the distant past is actually observed by astronomers today.
- Re: SN1987A and Apparent Age (10/31/00 8:52 AM, Part 3)
- SN1987A - Is It Apparently Time? (11/1/00 9:39 PM, Part 3)
- Apparent Age - A Critical Consideration (11/2/00 12:24 PM, Part 3)
- Re: SN1987A - A Couple More Clarifications (11/2/00 12:38 PM, Part 3)
- Re: SN1987A - Lightspeed Decay; Moon Dust (11/2/00 5:21 PM, Part 3)
- Re: Apparent Age - A Critical Consideration (11/3/00 8:36 AM, Part 3)
- Re: Apparent Age - A Critical Consideration (11/3/00 12:54 PM, Part 3)
- Re: Old Earth Icons (11/3/00 6:02 PM, Part 4)
- YEC - A False Hidden Assumption (11/5/00 8:36 AM, Part 4)
- Re: Old Earth Icons (11/5/00 9:40 AM, Part 4)
- Re: YEC - Geology (11/6/00 2:33 PM, Part 4)
- Re: YEC - Geology: Impact Craters (11/7/00 8:30 AM, Part 4)
- Re: Maury scenario... (11/8/00 9:07 PM, Part 4)
- Re: Maury scenario... and the true lesson. (11/8/00 11:15 PM, Part 4)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/11/00 12:00 AM, Part 5)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/11/00 11:32 AM, Part 5)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/11/00 12:36 PM, Part 5)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/12/00 9:30 AM, Part 5)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/12/00 10:37 AM, Part 5)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/12/00 4:37 PM, Part 5)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/13/00 1:12 PM, Part 5)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/14/00 6:11 AM, Part 5)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/14/00 6:21 AM, Part 5)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/14/00 9:10 AM, Part 6)
- Re: SN1987A (11/14/00 9:37 AM, Part 6)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/18/00 11:05 AM, Part 6)
- Re: YEC - A False Hidden Assumption (11/18/00 12:54 PM, Part 6)
- Re: SN1987A - Apparent Age Concept (11/18/00 3:58 PM, Part 7)
- YECs' Apparent Age Concept (11/19/00 10:37 AM, Part 7)
- Apparent Age - A Brief Theological Point, Plus (11/22/00 8:58 AM, Part 7)
- YEC - Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (11/26/00 10:09 AM, Part 7)
- Re: YEC - Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (11/26/00 10:32 PM, Part 8)
- The Metaphorical Language Of Creation (11/27/00 11:30 PM, Part 8)
- Re: YEC - Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (11/29/00 7:30 AM, Part 8)
- Re: YEC - Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (11/29/00 10:14 PM, Part 8)
- Re: YEC - Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (12/3/00 10:35 AM, Part 8)
- Re: YEC - Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (12/4/00 11:17 PM, Part 8)
- Re: Obstinacy in Error and Prejudicial Propaganda (12/5/00 9:15 PM, Part 8)
- Re: YEC - Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (12/5/00 11:11 PM, Part 9)
- Re: YEC (a different area) (12/7/00 7:41 AM, Part 9)
- Re: YEC (a different area) (12/8/00 7:47 AM, Part 9)
- Re: YEC - Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (12/8/00 8:17 AM, Part 9)
- Re: YEC - Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (12/9/00 1:04 AM, Part 9)
- Re: Obstinacy in Error and Prejudicial Propaganda (12/11/00 8:38 PM, Part 9)
- Re: YEC - Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (12/11/00 8:54 PM, Part 9)
- Re: YEC — Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (12/12/00 11:06 AM, Part 10)
- Re: YEC — Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (12/13/00 7:24 AM, Part 10)
- Re: YEC — Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (12/14/00 9:29 PM, Part 10)
- Re: The Metaphorical Language of Creation (12/15/00 11:16 PM, Part 10)
- Re: YEC — Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (12/15/00 11:19 PM, Part 10)
- Re: YEC — Truth, Evidence, and Biblical Inerrancy (12/16/00 8:50 PM, Part 10)
- Re: SN1987A Barry Stetterfield reply to T.G. (12/17/00 1:36 PM, Part 11)
- Re: SN1987A Barry Stetterfield reply to T.G. (12/18/00 8:58 AM, Part 11)
- SN1987A and Setterfield's Crackpot Idea (12/19/00 1:08 PM, Part 11)
- Re: SN1987A and Setterfield's Crackpot Idea (12/19/00 2:24 PM, Part 11)
- Re: SN1987A and Setterfield's Crackpot Idea (12/20/00 9:12 AM, Part 11)
- Ancient Universe — Spacetime Warping, other examples (or, Reality Lends No Credence to YEC) (1/15/01 11:35 PM, Part 11)
- Re: News: ...Stopping Light (1/19/01 11:04 PM, Part 11)
- Impact Craters on Earth (1/20/01 4:39 PM, Part 11)
- Re: News: ...Stopping Light (1/20/01 8:04 PM, Part 11)
- Re: News: ...Stopping Light (1/25/01 10:13 PM, Part 12)
- Re: Personal Beliefs and Prejudice (1/27/01 5:56 PM, Part 12)
- Re: Personal Beliefs and Prejudice (1/27/01 11:25 PM, Part 12)
- Re: Impact Craters on Earth; Credentialism (1/31/01 8:55 AM, Part 12)
- Re: Personal Beliefs and Prejudice (2/1/01 10:37 AM, Part 12)
- Re: Personal Beliefs and Prejudice (2/2/01 2:14 AM, Part 13)
- SN1987A, and Bait-and-Switch (2/3/01 10:30 AM, Part 13)
- Re: Personal Beliefs and Prejudice (2/5/01 10:23 PM, Part 13)
- Re: SN1987A, and Bait-and-Switch (2/5/01 10:28 PM, Part 13)
- Re: More About Bait-and-Switch on SN1987A (2/7/01 5:42 AM, Part 13)
- Re: Personal Beliefs and Prejudice (2/7/01 5:44 AM, Part 13)
- Re: More About Bait-and-Switch on SN1987A (2/7/01 4:08 PM, Part 13)
- Re: More About Bait-and-Switch on SN1987A (2/10/01 9:33 AM, Part 14)
- Re: Please answer — Bait-and-Switch on SN1987A (2/10/01 9:58 AM, Part 14)
- Re: Personal Beliefs and Prejudice (2/10/01 10:19 AM, Part 14)
- Re: More About Bait-and-Switch on SN1987A (2/11/01 10:46 AM, Part 14)
- Re: More About Bait-and-Switch on SN1987A (2/11/01 10:50 AM, Part 14)
- Re: Personal Beliefs and Prejudice (2/11/01 11:43 AM, Part 14)
- Re: Measuring Time — SN1987A (2/12/01 11:13 PM, Part 15)
- The Reality of SN1987A & The Reality of Antiquity (2/12/01 11:52 PM, Part 15)
- Re: A Removal and Explanation (2/16/01 12:52 AM, Part 15)
- Parting Comments (2/16/01 9:32 PM, Part 15)
|
|
|
-» -» -» UNDER CONSTRUCTION «- «- «-
|
|